<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TaylorMade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:26:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Alive and Kicking by Still kicking &#8249; TaylorMade &#8211;</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/16/alive-and-kicking/comment-page-1/#comment-2456</link>
		<dc:creator>Still kicking &#8249; TaylorMade &#8211;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/?p=55#comment-2456</guid>
		<description>[...] than a year ago I posted an article on my first exploits into iPhone apps, Social Networking and a general update on what I was working [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than a year ago I posted an article on my first exploits into iPhone apps, Social Networking and a general update on what I was working [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Belfast Builds Giants by Web Designer Notebook &#187; #buildconf</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/06/belfast-builds-giants/comment-page-1/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Designer Notebook &#187; #buildconf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/?p=102#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>[...] Belfast Builds Giants [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Belfast Builds Giants [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alert alert I&#8217;m going hyper! by Neely</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/19/alert-alert-im-going-hyper/comment-page-1/#comment-2425</link>
		<dc:creator>Neely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/19/alert-alert-im-going-hyper/#comment-2425</guid>
		<description>Im proper addicted to lucozade original. Ive been drinking it for nearly a year and having up to a litre a day. If I dont get it, I go crazy. Its the first thing I have in the morning and the last thing at night and a few times throughout the night aswell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im proper addicted to lucozade original. Ive been drinking it for nearly a year and having up to a litre a day. If I dont get it, I go crazy. Its the first thing I have in the morning and the last thing at night and a few times throughout the night aswell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox Login Problems by Jerry Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/firefox-login-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-2390</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/?p=82#comment-2390</guid>
		<description>Hi guys..I have the same issue ..firefox defaults my username and password back to and older username and password...I&#039;ve tried so many things to fix this issue to no avail.
Jerry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys..I have the same issue ..firefox defaults my username and password back to and older username and password&#8230;I&#8217;ve tried so many things to fix this issue to no avail.<br />
Jerry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Universal IE6 CSS &#8211; With Caution by Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/22/universal-ie6-css-with-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/?p=77#comment-2373</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy, thanks for your feedback. Just to clarify one thing before I respond, I don&#039;t work for an agency, I manage the central web team in the NI Civil Service. Any policies in place to cater for any specific users come from my team and are backed up with good reasoning.
With reflection my original post was more militant that originally intended but I still think the point I tried to convey is valid. In the NICS we have valid reasons for using IE6 and its so complicated I couldn&#039;t begin to explain without wearing my fingers out. Regardless of what I or anyone else thinks of IE6, if my user base is significant then I think we are right to cater for IE6 users as much as possible. A &quot;Universal&quot; stylesheet is not acceptable in my opinion and I guess it&#039;s this misleading name that I take exception to. Yes there may times in the private sector when it&#039;s ok to serve this stylesheet up and not cost effective to spend additional hours developing for IE6 but a Universal solution? Surely not? Only when appropriate to do so IE6 CSS would be a much catchier name!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy, thanks for your feedback. Just to clarify one thing before I respond, I don&#8217;t work for an agency, I manage the central web team in the NI Civil Service. Any policies in place to cater for any specific users come from my team and are backed up with good reasoning.<br />
With reflection my original post was more militant that originally intended but I still think the point I tried to convey is valid. In the NICS we have valid reasons for using IE6 and its so complicated I couldn&#8217;t begin to explain without wearing my fingers out. Regardless of what I or anyone else thinks of IE6, if my user base is significant then I think we are right to cater for IE6 users as much as possible. A &#8220;Universal&#8221; stylesheet is not acceptable in my opinion and I guess it&#8217;s this misleading name that I take exception to. Yes there may times in the private sector when it&#8217;s ok to serve this stylesheet up and not cost effective to spend additional hours developing for IE6 but a Universal solution? Surely not? Only when appropriate to do so IE6 CSS would be a much catchier name!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Universal IE6 CSS &#8211; With Caution by Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/22/universal-ie6-css-with-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/?p=77#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>Interesting. It seems from your article that you work for an agency who are forcing employees to use IE6 which even Microsoft have stopped supporting. As such, your employers have a policy of developing for it. 
I don&#039;t think your post really addresses the problem being discussed though.
Your argument seems to be that even though nobody wants to pay to support IE6 (not Microsoft, not clients and not the people who refuse to stop using it) developers should still go ahead and do so. This is just the tip of the iceberg of course, supporting IE generally but especially version 6 inherently means a departure from web standards in most cases. As a freelancer myself, supporting IE6 goes at the bottom of a long list of priorities that many clients are stretching to pay for including (but not limited to and in no particular order) accessibility, seo, photography and illustration. You aren&#039;t alone of course, there are still people moaning about lack of support for ie5.
Thanks for a stimulating post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. It seems from your article that you work for an agency who are forcing employees to use IE6 which even Microsoft have stopped supporting. As such, your employers have a policy of developing for it.<br />
I don&#8217;t think your post really addresses the problem being discussed though.<br />
Your argument seems to be that even though nobody wants to pay to support IE6 (not Microsoft, not clients and not the people who refuse to stop using it) developers should still go ahead and do so. This is just the tip of the iceberg of course, supporting IE generally but especially version 6 inherently means a departure from web standards in most cases. As a freelancer myself, supporting IE6 goes at the bottom of a long list of priorities that many clients are stretching to pay for including (but not limited to and in no particular order) accessibility, seo, photography and illustration. You aren&#8217;t alone of course, there are still people moaning about lack of support for ie5.<br />
Thanks for a stimulating post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4o dear by Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/4o-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/4o-dear/#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>Darren you are a legend! Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren you are a legend! Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox Login Problems by Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/firefox-login-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-2336</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/?p=82#comment-2336</guid>
		<description>Jack thanks for this. I&#039;m using the latest build of Firefox and the issue only exists on my laptop at home, not my PC at work so I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s like a REALLY bad case of caching! However I&#039;m also using Firebug so will try that out thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack thanks for this. I&#8217;m using the latest build of Firefox and the issue only exists on my laptop at home, not my PC at work so I&#8217;m thinking it&#8217;s like a REALLY bad case of caching! However I&#8217;m also using Firebug so will try that out thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox Login Problems by JackP</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/firefox-login-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>JackP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/?p=82#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>The only other thing I can find relates to firebug plugin ... are you using this:
http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=1277</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only other thing I can find relates to firebug plugin &#8230; are you using this:<br />
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=1277" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=1277</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox Login Problems by JackP</title>
		<link>http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/firefox-login-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>JackP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquiweb.com/blog/?p=82#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>Not come across this problem before, nor heard of it. I use firefox as my standard browser and have had no problems - across multiple machines.

A couple of thoughts:

1. which version of firefox are you using, and with which plugins?
2. If you&#039;re willing to trust me with a username/password, I could see if I have any difficulties logging in via my firefox. If I DO, then the problem is more likely with the installation, if I DON&#039;T, then maybe it&#039;s your firefox install/settings that is at fault?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not come across this problem before, nor heard of it. I use firefox as my standard browser and have had no problems &#8211; across multiple machines.</p>
<p>A couple of thoughts:</p>
<p>1. which version of firefox are you using, and with which plugins?<br />
2. If you&#8217;re willing to trust me with a username/password, I could see if I have any difficulties logging in via my firefox. If I DO, then the problem is more likely with the installation, if I DON&#8217;T, then maybe it&#8217;s your firefox install/settings that is at fault?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
